When we care about someone and see that they are doing things that are not in their best interests, we try to find constructive and supportive ways to communicate that to them.When we care about a city, province. and country, it becomes much harder to find a way to make a difference.
Politicians vary in interests, life experience, values and goals. Some bureaucrats are impressive in their commitment to doing the best for the area they oversee. The Ontario Ombudsman, Andre Morin, and the Children’s Advocate Irwin Elman are two examples. However, there is a side of bureaucracy that can be narrow, cold, impersonal, indifferent, and forgetful of the fact that they are public servants.
I love Toronto, Ontario, and Canada! An architect with a vision can do a set of drawings and people will see exactly what he/she hopes to achieve. An engineer could estimate the time required to complete the project, and the cost. After several decades of helping people solve problems, I can see where certain systems are not as helpful nor as cost efficient as they could be. For more than ten years I have approached various mayors, bureaucrats and politicians from time to time. I have a file of letters that could provide material for a sitcom. The response has always been a variation on the same theme…basically, ”get lost”. There are programs and services that we have on the federal, provincial and municipal levels that are world class and my plan is to share these ideas internationally. However there are programs and services which are not OK and I plan to describe them.
Here is my 2015 challenge to everyone reading this. Please share the content and if any of it is important to you, speak out, say something, do something!
Our city, Toronto, has a few thousand people in shelters at any given time at an enormous cost. Despite this investment, after all these years we still have people living and dying on the streets. Read my book, available on Amazon, “Urban Exiles: An overview of Homelessness.” Then, check on Google for the costs to our city of perpetuating a system that is not working. Our social housing is not working either. The last I heard, there were seventy-seven thousand people on the waiting list.
About ten years ago, determined to solve this problem, I went to the then head of the housing organization with some ideas. I explained that in the course of my work I had met a number of people who were living in social housing who could be living in the private sector. Some worked for cash which they did not declare while others brought in friends or relatives who worked full time but were not officially on the lease. Others lived in the so-called “market rent units” of our social housing program. I suggested that we offer an amnesty and an incentive so that people would move out and either rent in the regular market or buy a place of their own. Prices were affordable at the time. Under this plan, no one would be pursued for misrepresenting their financial situation. Rather than heeding my advice (or returning my call), the then top man instead instituted a policy demanding full disclosure of tenants income annually ”or else”…
A few years later once leadership had changed, I tried again by meeting with a staff member at the housing office on Yonge St. I shared my ideas for helping those with the ability to move out of social housing thus freeing up units for people from the shelters and those living at, or below, the poverty line. Again, she said she was not really interested in my idea. I will never forget this one comment she made: ”We are landlords, not social workers… we collect rent and maintain the properties.. we don’t get involved with the people otherwise”. She walked me to the elevator. ”You call this social housing,” I asked, “what’s the social mean?” She turned and walked away.
When I read in the paper that a new director had been hired, I arranged another appointment. Hope dies hard. He listened politely, and then walked me right to the front door and I never heard from him again. He’s since been replaced and I’m glad.
It is possible to restructure social housing, empty units, help people move on and reduce the need for anything but short term transitional shelters. Shelters should be a hub for all restorative services not just ”three hots and a cot” for the amount of money they get per person (read the book, and read my lips)!
Last for today, why would a person with a job and a paycheck be in ”market rent housing” owned by social housing when they could be out here like the rest of us in the private sector and free up those units for people who do not have a choice other than shelters or streets?
The next few posts will be about improving healthcare for all of us in Ontario and, on a federal level, stopping the huge underground economy which does not pay tax.
As always, I welcome comments, suggestions and donations.